We are designed by God to be unified with God, and apart from God mans core inner self loses the engramatic image of God from his psyche, allowing man to become nothing more than an empty shell in comparison to God’s original design. I believe this is solely because God is so holy that when man fell from grace, it was such a drastic departure from God’s holy nature for man to sin, that even the ability to comprehend God’s fullness and character were removed from mans psychological make up when man died spiritually as a result of his sin. Over time this inward comparative fellowship that I have named as the engramatic connection between God and man, has faded further from our active make up, like the rings that move further from the epicenter of an event on the surface of a body of water, such as a drop of blood into a pool of water creates concentric rings flowing outward from the center, eventually fading from the view in the surface and from effect as experienced below the surface. If we move away from one perception and reality in relation to our original condition and position as it related to God, apart from God man has morally continued to degrade over time. And if the science of motion bares any relationship to our spiritual dynamics, history has taught us that as man moves away from God, he invariably moves toward an enigmatic self image, one that becomes perversely turned inward toward himself, and thus develops an outward hostility to the moral authority of God in any number of tangible and intangible forms of both, logical and illogical sociopathic attitudes and behaviors. Essentially mans self perception prior to the fall was in focus based upon our spiritual dynamic above the waterline, and subsequently our dynamic self now functions below the waterline because we are dead in our sin unless by faith we accept salvation from sin through Christ.
The history of Germany’s Third Reich is an undeniable example of one such outward manifestation of the sociopathic enigma of humanism, as represented in the Nazi state of nationalistic socialism, creating an outward hostility to further harden the shell of a humanists self imposed isolation from all Godly moral influence. The idea of socialism itself does not represent an enigma toward biblical values in action within the framework of a society, it is when the values of man in his state of isolation from Godly influence in the formation of his value system and self image, that the ideologies representative of socialism become contaminated by the psyche of the enigmatic self, the personification of evil then takes form within the psyche of man apart from God, as he continues spiraling downward toward the reprobate mind, taking on the characteristics of the final form of mans fall from grace, the mind of Antichrist. Thus to further embrace and promote a broad Unitarian sophistry around the desire to abdicate oneself from God’s higher moral authority, man asserts his own altruistic utilitarian humanistic attitudes as the pseudo-divine proliferation and forbear of amoral relativism in the form of the humanist nation state or the sociopolitical aberration such as Nazism and communism.
I believe this is why in his book, “The Road to Serfdom” author F. A. Hayek was able to state emphatically that all forms of socialism invariably lead to totalitarianism. We see this evidenced in the outward hostility of the Nazi mindset toward God’s chosen people the Jews, who by their very description are summarily attributed as enemies of the state, because they represent an anathema to the enigmatic mindset of the humanistic state of mind and its authoritarianism, which lends itself as the mechanism of widespread collective hostility toward all who were ethnically impure within German society. Although the idea began in relation to ideological purity concerning the removal of all Marxists and “any attitude that is contrary to the goal” of Nazism (Communism, secularism, Islamic fundamentalism, etc.), it quickly spread to encompass everything that did not specifically serve the success of Nazism. Why then would Hitler need to succeed under the premise that Jews were the enemy, unless the enigmatic mind prevailed upon the psyche to concoct the notion that it is not perverse, but practical and natural to perceive Jews as an enemy, merely based upon their relationship with God under the guise of ideological purity? This of course precludes the very rationale of any moral derivative concerning their view of self, and their relationship to God the creator, and more narrowly views their relationship to the Nazi state, primarily that the ideologically and ethnically impure, violate the sensibility of the aberrated mind that now controls the mechanisms of social conduct, by dehumanizing all who are perceived as placing anything or anyone above the state or Nazi party. This particular form of secularism is the tool used to dismantle the moral structures of German society in order to achieve the product of totalitarianism.
Recreating the image of Germany in the image of Nazism is what led to the individual revision of each person’s worldview. Only by the blinding darkness of evil in the form the thought police, was it possible for Hitler and his minions to exert such power and influence over the people of Germany. Greed and power are very potent narcotics when coupled with lust for blood and indulgence in evil as a practical function of daily life. When faced with annihilation by a machine of death, such as was the threat to any who stood in the way of the Nazi party, even the moral structures of life for the Jews fractured against the cold steel of this amoral secular enigma, because they did not recognize psychologically or spiritually that the provision of grace through Jesus Christ was available to them. When the fear of God is removed from the leadership and structures of government, the fall of the people and society is the next shoe to drop. It starts small, imposing certain requirements such as the need to produce identification to protect the public interest, and then it progresses into an ”us and them” mentality, until finally the evil that once hid from the light of men because of the righteousness of God in their midst, boldly steps into the forefront of their mind, exerting control over their mind and capturing their heart, they become dead men walking as though they were alive. To the onlooker this realism seems like a dream from the past, a nightmare really. Although when compared to the events we see unfolding before us today, even within the context of our very own government, our schools, our neighborhoods, perhaps it is not as much a cry from the past as it more accurately represents a distant thunder which lies before us; drawing closer with each passing day.
Western society today is confronted by a similar challenge to our fundamentally Judeo-Christian sociopolitical system. To suggest that our founding principles are not based upon the Judeo-Christian values of the Bible because America is merely a nation of immigrants of whom the majority are Christian, is the same as saying Jesus was merely a man who was well liked by a small group of people in Roman occupied Israel until died. The evidence that America has moved politically toward the direction of denying the existence of God, is found in far more than the headline in which President Obama said America is no longer a Christian nation. In my opinion, his statement is not arbitrary or politically motivated, he is merely declaring his observation based upon the direction from which he is coming, the socio-political realm in which he lives each day, and in the present tense of the direction he is moving toward and believes our nation is moving toward; like all others dead in their sin, his worldview is oriented below the surface of the water. That he mitigated any reference to the historic facts concerning our Christian founding and its relevance to our constitution however, this is where we see a departure from an honest assessment and an intentional disregard for historic relevance, because admitting the relevance of these historically provable facts would require him to admit his obvious secular motivations for interpreting the constitution in the strictly secular view he promotes with his political agenda. To further account for the content of his observations, one can examine more than the sociopolitical circumstances of our culture today, one can also evaluate these circumstances from a historical and Biblical perspective.
Since the 1950′s America has steadily seen a decline in the influence of biblical morality in government policy and practice, in the academic focus of our public school system, in the advanced academic programs in our universities and colleges, and in the unconstrained emphasis on the amoral secular humanistic world view promoted in these institutions, in place of the biblical moral world view embraced and promoted by our founders. Unless you have been frozen or vacationing in Siberia for the past sixty-five years, it should not come as a surprise to learn that America is not viewed by many of our political leaders as a Christian nation – it would require that they share a world view that is Christian in order for them to reach such a conclusion. So for them America is not a Christian nation, which in essence makes them at best indifferent to Christians, or at worst intolerant toward Christians, since our values tend to hold them to a much higher moral standard than they are used to being accountable to. It is indeed an interesting position for each of us, since we embrace America’s Christian worldview which includes our founder’s Christian heritage, and they deliberately see the world from a secular point of view.
For the secular non-Christian politician, this represents an opportunity to manipulate the public opinion of their worldview, and thus our world view, by aligning themselves with issues that are important to Christians, even if they do not agree with the biblical moral premise from which we derive our political values and orientations. Do you ever wonder how Christian Germans were manipulated by the leadership in Germany into conforming to their policies? I believe it was essentially by the same amoral secular interpretation of law we see applied by politicians in America today, by omitting the moral premise of any question about the rule of law from the equation! For the Christians in our country there is a moral dilemma when it comes to voting for politicians who are not Christians, we are casting a vote for a person who could ultimately undermine the very religious freedoms we enjoy under our constitution, based upon the rule of law. The progressive politician has wielded the rule of law, not based upon the Judeo-Christian foundation upon which it rests from our founders historical perspective, these miscreants have diverted the focus from its moral premise using the man created secular perspective in order to avoid facing the moral consequence demanded by the rule of law as it is intended.
The rule of law itself is really a topic which requires careful examination, especially in light of the intentions of the framers in writing the constitution. If the foundational aspects of the rule of law are not based upon the Biblical truth that all men are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights, then that means that government (Thus man) is the supreme authority, not the rule of law based upon the revealed truth from the Word of God, from which we derive the idea that the power of government only exists by the consent of the people [Not the secular interpretation of the rule of law]. Since it is people who are endowed by God our creator with these rights and not government, any interpretation of the constitution and the rule of law apart from this focused moral view, is an infringement upon the individual rights of every person recognized by the representative idea of the rule of law. Why this is important, especially to us as Americans, is that if our understanding of our own form of government is permitted to be hijacked by the secular humanistic politicians, then we will no longer have a representative form of government based upon an idea of a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Rather, we will be a people governed by a collective of secular political elitists, those who believe they know what is best for us personally, individually, and collectively. Sounds a bit like the cradle to grave mentality of the Nazi party if you ask me!
In light of our constitution and the rule of law it is said to embody, we can and should hold our representatives to account, especially as it relates to the judiciary and the judicial activism that has become so prominent in recent decades. We may cringe when the executive branch takes up the pen to write an executive order, but when that same branch appoints or recommends appointments to our judiciary, we are no longer the benefactors of a person who is keenly dedicated to a view of the rule of law based upon the historically accurate Judeo-Christian interpretation of our constitution, today we see more than ever the finality in which secularism has driven the nails of subversion into the lifeblood of our constitution, by denying its Biblical moral foundation. Stripping us of the dignity of the rule of law in the name of some secular interpretation of fairness, which is nothing more than a secular doctrine intended to replace the Biblically moral foundation intended by our founders, and has nothing to do with rightly governing our country. This is tantamount to crucifying Washington for crossing Valley Forge! It’s time for the patriots in this nation to awaken the heart of America and reestablish the true basis of the rule of law, which is its foundation upon the Word of almighty God!
With over 85 towns in Great Britain now observing the abomination known as Sharia law, which by the way are off limits to local British law enforcement since these communities now have their own Sharia courts and judges, how long do you think it will be before some unsuspecting non-muslim British citizen finds himself in a sharia court, or how many politicians do you think there are in America that can’t wait to put one in your back yard? And how many secular judges do you think there are who will legislate from the bench to make sure it happens. These challenges to our thinking as to how right or how wrong this may seem are never articulated by any one person in government, as to make us keenly aware of their presence, so let us narrow our focus to the realm in which these nuances of realism begin to take form. For they do not leap onto the scene and into our hearts and minds, instantaneously taking us by surprise, they are far too subtle in their nature to project into our psyche and risk the awaking of our conscience by frontal attack.
The subtle variations of theme are typical of the strategies employed by the evil minds at work in the unconscious world of the spiritual dominion. In our culture we already see various signs of the principles of evil working to subdue the consciences of people. Remember that the goal of these principles is not to overthrow governments, but to overthrow God from the heart of mankind. Keeping the focus on man hinders our perception by removing the Godly perspective from our thought processes, and our critical thinking on matters pertaining to moral judgment. One example for instance requires us to narrow our focus upon the false claim of diversity, as it is promoted by the secular community. Really diversity is another ploy, a diversion intended to subvert our attention from God and back to man; once again revealing the characteristics of the principles at work in the psyche of those who are dead in their sin.
Since social diversity is expressed by secularism as that which excludes any public display or affiliation to all things related to Christianity, of its relation to America’s heritage or social characteristics, secularism again demonstrates a subjective view of reality by promoting a man based worldview of diversity, a word which itself speaks to that which is all inclusive. Yet the contradiction that obviates the direction from which they falsely propose the use of the word is presumed to be overlooked by anyone capable of finding the word in a dictionary. If secularists are the only group that get to decide what diversity means to the rest of us, and it only includes non-Christian ethnic ideas, then it further demonstrates the humanistic mindset which seeks to exclude God from all public venues and institutions, all public school systems, all judicial appointments, and all people not able to think for their self outside of the secular sophistry.
The answer to this question finds the root of all such diabolical and evil plans. For as much righteous moral outrage as one can muster for the Hitler’s and Hun’s of the world, each of these were merely instruments, wielded by the hand of the god of this age, Satan aka Lucifer, and in personification the antichrist. Through out history since the beginning of this age, the age of grace that represents the coming of Jesus the Messiah, we have witnessed multiple instances of the personification of the antichrist in the form of men who were willing instruments for perpetrating and focusing evil against humanity. Satan has a history of counterfeiting what God does to save the world, he imitates and mockingly subverts those willing, to use them to attack and destroy Gods people. The Syrian king Antiochus Epiphanes, the persecutor of the Jews, was the first historic representation of the antichrist archetype. This version of the antichrist reveals much about the next version, yet to come in our age.
To many, Hitler represented another instance of the antichrist archetype, especially because of his proclivity for killing the Jewish people. Hitler went beyond the idea of ideological purity in the Nazi flavor of totalitarianism via socialism; he behaved in ways that many would describe as a man possessed by demons. Based upon the descriptions of Hitler in the final days leading up to his alleged suicide, I find this notion quite plausible. As radical as Nazism was in Germany, the Bolsheviks were no less radical in their zeal to over throw the provisional government in Russia. Seizing control of Petrograd without firing a shot, they demonstrated a different approach, but the end result of totalitarianism in the form of communism carried with it the same denial of God and the murder of millions of innocent people, most of who were merely perceived as a threat to the goal of unified madness. As we see the brutality and insurrection unfolding in the Middle East in the name of democratizing Islamic countries, at what point will the Christians of the world, including our own country, be included as wearers of the golden Star of David, as we are marched into the ovens of diversity under the guise of tolerance.